About Me

microformats hcard approaching

is a Professional Geek for Microsoft Australia. More info lives underneath the About Box...

-33.831416, 151.222526
MrCell+61.417.212181
Work:
1 Epping Road
North Ryde, NSW 2113
Australia
photo of nick hodge

Stuff

View Nick Hodge's profile on LinkedIn

msdn channel 9

Acrobat, Canberra, Microsoft

By Nick Hodge | November 13, 2006

Hav­ing presen­ted for Adobe over the past 8 years, I get a little touchy when someone attacks tech­nical presenters. It’s like being a part of a fra­tern­ity. Round up the wagons!

Demon­strat­ing soft­ware: the col­lec­tion of skillz are not taught by Toast­mas­ters. Nor most Present­a­tion Train­ers. It is a set of unique tech­niques, that are gen­er­ally nutured and passed on from mas­ter to trainee; gen­er­a­tion to generation.

You need to have your eye and ear on the audi­ence; the setup for the next joke is on your mind; you need to be “on mes­sage”, the soft­ware needs to be work­ing: and most import­antly, what you are show­ing is get­ting through. In these days of instant blog­ging, everything you say is pub­lic property.

So, Eric’s com­ments on the Acrobat 8 road­show in Can­berra are inter­est­ing. Mark, the Adobe presenter has respon­ded.

Some­times to com­mu­nic­ate a story, words and phrases are used that may be a little too com­bat­ive. Yeah, I’ve dissed non-Adobe soft­ware vendors in present­a­tions: usu­ally to sell a point or get an emo­tional response from an audi­ence. This style only works with medium sized audi­ences. My favour­ite was play­fully diss­ing Microsoft whilst present­ing at Microsoft.
Onto the Facts.

  1. XML does NOT magic­ally equal a smal­ler file size; in fact the reverse is prob­ably true. In the case of PPT in PDF, the file size bene­fits of PDF accrue from image com­pres­sion (includ­ing gradients/blends and reused ele­ments). Other bene­fits are cross-platform pack­aging (espe­cially typefaces) and secur­ity (ensur­ing people can­not change the presentation)If you were send­ing a doc­u­ment to people expect­ing changes, PDF is not the answer.
  2. Out­look PSTs suck in a cross-platform world. And let’s face it; in the future no mat­ter what plat­form you are on, everything is a leg­acy platform.I have 6.5Gb of email locked up in PST files con­tain­ing 6+ years of email his­tory. Search­ing these involves launch­ing Out­look, load­ing the PST and doing a slow search. Thank good­ness for Google Desktop search if you are a Win­dows per­son. You’re stuffed if you spend most of your time out­side the mono-culture. Put­ting emails into a stand­ard pub­lished and open file format, say PDF/A, for future ref­er­ence is some­thing many people care about.
  3. Mark covered this Fact in his blog. There is a law of entropy work­ing here. Once data is squeezed out in PDF, get­ting back a fully work­ing, semantic­ally rich doc­u­ment is going to be dif­fi­cult. In the case of Office applic­a­tions, PDF is not an edit­able exchange format. The get­ting data back out of a PDF is best a util­ity; and included in Acrobat 6, 7 and 8.
  4. Launch Acrobat 6 and compare/contrast the Acrobat 7 and 8 launch times; even the Reader. There is a world of dif­fer­ence even without Win­dows cach­ing the applic­a­tion in RAM (some­thing you can turn off with a few Registry entries on Win­dows). Adobe has dra­mat­ic­ally improved the launch time from a woe­ful Acrobat 6 (launch times sucked)

I didn’t attend the Can­berra launch; only the morn­ing ses­sion of the Sydney Acrobat 8 launch. Split­ting the group into two “halves” is a recog­ni­tion that Acrobat has two large audi­ences: one cre­at­ive and the other stand­ard office style users. Can­berra has always been a tough demo­graphic to get right audience-wise for Adobe. I agree with Eric: 20 people is not good: the whole tone of the present­a­tion changes with less than 50 people.

Also, in the mod­ern highly con­nec­ted world — it is my opin­ion that “Launch” style present­a­tions with too much sales hype are a thing of the past. People need con­tent, and lots of it. Con­ver­sa­tions such as blog­ging post con­fer­ence are excel­lent mech­an­isms of mak­ing the con­tent more relevant.

Topics: acrobat8, adobe, microsoft, outlook, technology | 2 Comments »

2 Responses to “Acrobat, Canberra, Microsoft”

  1. Misty Says:
    December 18th, 2006 at 11:48 am

    Present­a­tion skills not taught by Toast­mas­ters– if not, why not? It’s the lack of present­ing skills which dulls the senses of these road­shows, and the arrog­ance of ALL Mac users in gen­eral, is just so annoy­ing. YAWN. It’s old, it’s bor­ing. You say these tech­niques are handed down by mas­ters to other train­ers, what tech­niques? Tech­nical stuff? How to launch a pro­gram? Leave the present­ing to pro­fes­sion­als, not geeks, please! And by the way, your web­site is really hard on the eyes, impossible to read, and badly designed. And as for your photo col­lec­tion — who really wants to see pho­tos of your mini? and a Thai res­taur­ant? And a cat???!! You are not that interesting.

  2. hodgenick Says:
    December 18th, 2006 at 2:46 pm

    Misty
    Merry Christ­mas, happy new year. I am not sure where this com­ment is com­ing from…

    You are quite right — I am not that inter­est­ing. I am not sure why you think a per­sonal web site should be more than any­thing per­sonal; for com­ments, per­sonal interests etc. I am not a designer, and your com­ments on the read­ab­il­ity are welcome.

    Toast­mas­ters do provide excel­lent present­a­tion train­ing, not demon­stra­tion train­ing. Demon­strat­ing soft­ware to audi­ences is not easy. What don’t they teach? How to not lose an audi­ence when explain­ing a com­plex new fea­ture. Match­ing a new fea­ture to a prob­lem a large num­ber of your audi­ence has. Keep­ing to time and hav­ing enough know­ledge to take audi­ence ques­tions and show the answer. To name a few.

    I don’t what you have against Mac users, geeks, or MINIs. All seem pretty innoc­u­ous to me.

Comments