Comments on: A Life in Packets http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848 microsoft, munging and on being a mercurial iconoclastic professional geek. Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:42:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: nickhodge.com | mungenet » Learning Technology Challenge. It’s not the Technology. http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848/comment-page-1#comment-7292 nickhodge.com | mungenet » Learning Technology Challenge. It’s not the Technology. Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:35:55 +0000 http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848#comment-7292 [...] Unless you are stuck on a deserted island, your life is going to be collaborative. Work, too. In a connected world, this is amplified and packetised. [...] […] Unless you are stuck on a deserted island, your life is going to be collaborative. Work, too. In a connected world, this is amplified and packetised. […]

]]> By: hodgenick http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848/comment-page-1#comment-7138 hodgenick Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:26:15 +0000 http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848#comment-7138 I am not that old in yrs, but way older than 50ms :-) I am not that old in yrs, but way older than 50ms :-)

]]> By: mike seyfang http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848/comment-page-1#comment-7137 mike seyfang Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:23:21 +0000 http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848#comment-7137 Shit - has been nice knowing you - ttl=50 Ping has started ... PING www.nickhodge.com (208.97.134.179): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 208.97.134.179: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=247.127 ms 64 bytes from 208.97.134.179: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=247.105 ms 64 bytes from 208.97.134.179: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=246.053 ms --- www.nickhodge.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 246.053/246.762/247.127/0.501 ms Shit — has been nice knowing you — ttl=50

Ping has started …

PING http://www.nickhodge.com (208.97.134.179): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 208.97.134.179: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=247.127 ms
64 bytes from 208.97.134.179: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=247.105 ms
64 bytes from 208.97.134.179: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=246.053 ms

— http://www.nickhodge.com ping statistics —
3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 246.053/246.762/247.127/0.501 ms

]]> By: hodgenick http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848/comment-page-1#comment-7022 hodgenick Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:05:55 +0000 http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848#comment-7022 agree on QoS. Also, I wander what my TTL is. agree on QoS.

Also, I wander what my TTL is.

]]> By: LD http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848/comment-page-1#comment-6919 LD Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:38:18 +0000 http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1848#comment-6919 Sometimes we need to apply QoS to packets ensure that prioritisation occurs. In life also. ;-) Sometimes we need to apply QoS to packets ensure that prioritisation occurs. In life also. ;-)

]]>