<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publicis Mojo accidental Spammer for Metamucil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783</link>
	<description>microsoft, munging and on being a mercurial iconoclastic professional geek.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pollenizer - Startup Management Garage - web business, internet applications and online services</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-121301</link>
		<dc:creator>Pollenizer - Startup Management Garage - web business, internet applications and online services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-121301</guid>
		<description>[...] email from Publicis Mojo representing Metamucil in an attempt to engage the blogging community. Nick Hodge covered it nicely here since a number of us blogosnobs received the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] email from Publicis Mojo representing Metamucil in an attempt to engage the blogging community. Nick Hodge covered it nicely here since a number of us blogosnobs received the […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;ve been way too busy to post lately &#8230; &#171; JargonMaster</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119771</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;ve been way too busy to post lately &#8230; &#171; JargonMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119771</guid>
		<description>[...] in P-aaaaargh!   &#8230; but if I had the time, I would have written something like this or maybe something along these lines.     No Comments   Leave a Commenttrackback addressThere was an error with your comment, please try [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] in P-aaaaargh!   … but if I had the time, I would have written something like this or maybe something along these lines.     No Comments   Leave a Commenttrackback addressThere was an error with your comment, please try […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Examples of Social Media Damage Control Â» Skribe Productions</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119646</link>
		<dc:creator>Examples of Social Media Damage Control Â» Skribe Productions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 08:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119646</guid>
		<description>[...] on real life situations. The details of the first one (the email that went wrong) can be found here and the second one (corporate thug or consumer protector) can be found [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] on real life situations. The details of the first one (the email that went wrong) can be found here and the second one (corporate thug or consumer protector) can be found […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119489</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119489</guid>
		<description>Dixie, as much as I&#039;m not a user of the product you&#039;re working with, you&#039;ve won some points by being really open here. Big props to you for that.

Mick&#039;s right, we&#039;d prefer to talk to *you* and whoever else is on the team at your personal addresses.

Your busted email explanation sounds kind of iffy, but I think we&#039;re all keen to give you the benefit of the doubt based on your openness.

Like Laurel, I&#039;m always up for a freebie ;) 

More importantly, I&#039;m now interested enough in this campaign to talk about you on my blog (tonight some time) based on your responses here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dixie, as much as I’m not a user of the product you’re working with, you’ve won some points by being really open here. Big props to you for that.</p>
<p>Mick’s right, we’d prefer to talk to *you* and whoever else is on the team at your personal addresses.</p>
<p>Your busted email explanation sounds kind of iffy, but I think we’re all keen to give you the benefit of the doubt based on your openness.</p>
<p>Like Laurel, I’m always up for a freebie <img src='http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>More importantly, I’m now interested enough in this campaign to talk about you on my blog (tonight some time) based on your responses here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Liubinskas</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119488</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Liubinskas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119488</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dixie. That&#039;s a pretty good comeback. (except the brand name drop, but not too bad). 

Screwing up, admitting it and then really making amends is one of the best way to wow people and &#039;live the flow&#039; and you&#039;re on your way. 

Putting your phone number in is also good, if you mean it. Better if you use dixie@publicisdigital.com though otherwise we&#039;re still thinking it&#039;s a catchall, which it might be but you can make me feel better about it. 

&quot;Communities, the temperamental mistress. Caring and supporting, but ruthless in a flash.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dixie. That’s a pretty good comeback. (except the brand name drop, but not too bad). </p>
<p>Screwing up, admitting it and then really making amends is one of the best way to wow people and ‘live the flow’ and you’re on your way. </p>
<p>Putting your phone number in is also good, if you mean it. Better if you use <a href="mailto:dixie@publicisdigital.com">dixie@publicisdigital.com</a> though otherwise we’re still thinking it’s a catchall, which it might be but you can make me feel better about it. </p>
<p>“Communities, the temperamental mistress. Caring and supporting, but ruthless in a flash.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixie</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119487</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119487</guid>
		<description>Hello again everyone.
Thanks for all your feedback and patience. We genuinely desire to do right by the blogosphere and want to be completely transparent on what we are trying to do.

We researched the Australian blogosphere, finding 25 bloggers who we believed would be interested in a Fibresure xmas gift pack containing a product sample and a few other goodies. 

Using a general email account (to share between a few people), we emailed the bloggers about the gift packs. Unfortunately, the email account was set up incorrectly (which would have appeared pretty odd to the recipients) and we neglected to include any personalization in the message. A couple quick lessons learned (better QA, more personalization) over here! 

Thanks for the opportunity to explain ourselves. I hope you can see we are not trying to be subversive or spam anyone as it might have appeared. If anyone has any questions on this, please contract me directly.

Thanks.
Dixie
Producer â€“ Publicis Digital
02 9258 9367
BloggerRelations@publicisdigital.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again everyone.<br />
Thanks for all your feedback and patience. We genuinely desire to do right by the blogosphere and want to be completely transparent on what we are trying to do.</p>
<p>We researched the Australian blogosphere, finding 25 bloggers who we believed would be interested in a Fibresure xmas gift pack containing a product sample and a few other goodies. </p>
<p>Using a general email account (to share between a few people), we emailed the bloggers about the gift packs. Unfortunately, the email account was set up incorrectly (which would have appeared pretty odd to the recipients) and we neglected to include any personalization in the message. A couple quick lessons learned (better QA, more personalization) over here! </p>
<p>Thanks for the opportunity to explain ourselves. I hope you can see we are not trying to be subversive or spam anyone as it might have appeared. If anyone has any questions on this, please contract me directly.</p>
<p>Thanks.<br />
Dixie<br />
Producer â€“ Publicis Digital<br />
02 9258 9367<br />
<a href="mailto:BloggerRelations@publicisdigital.com">BloggerRelations@publicisdigital.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Papworth</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119481</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Papworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119481</guid>
		<description>Heh. This was my response to their email, sent yesterday:

&quot;Send the email to me again, as a real person and I&#039;ll send you my details. But if you are a spammer, go away! o.O &quot;

I&#039;m always up for free stuff. :P 

I was particularly amused that there was no real person behind &quot;Blogger Relations&quot;. No human beings in the conversation. Well except me and that&#039;s debateable. :P *sighs* Social media can be so lonely :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. This was my response to their email, sent yesterday:</p>
<p>“Send the email to me again, as a real person and I’ll send you my details. But if you are a spammer, go away! o.O ”</p>
<p>I’m always up for free stuff. <img src='http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I was particularly amused that there was no real person behind “Blogger Relations”. No human beings in the conversation. Well except me and that’s debateable. <img src='http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  *sighs* Social media can be so lonely <img src='http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Liubinskas</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119480</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Liubinskas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119480</guid>
		<description>Oh, I thought I was the influential blogger that got it. 

Dang. 

Oh, well. I think the play of metamucil giving people the $hits is pretty funny. 

But it is a clear display of failure of a PR 1.0 company to get 2.0. It was close, but nope. 

They found me on twitter, so an @ message would have been nice. 

But the biggest failure is not being human. You can&#039;t connect to another human from Mojo Publicis. You have to do it human to human. 

If in doubt, ask one person in the space first. Pay them if you have to, but we&#039;re a nice bunch and will point you in the right direction. 

Nice job Nick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I thought I was the influential blogger that got it. </p>
<p>Dang. </p>
<p>Oh, well. I think the play of metamucil giving people the $hits is pretty funny. </p>
<p>But it is a clear display of failure of a PR 1.0 company to get 2.0. It was close, but nope. </p>
<p>They found me on twitter, so an @ message would have been nice. </p>
<p>But the biggest failure is not being human. You can’t connect to another human from Mojo Publicis. You have to do it human to human. </p>
<p>If in doubt, ask one person in the space first. Pay them if you have to, but we’re a nice bunch and will point you in the right direction. </p>
<p>Nice job Nick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119479</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119479</guid>
		<description>Heehee.

Spelling fail. smap=spam...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heehee.</p>
<p>Spelling fail. smap=spam…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119478</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119478</guid>
		<description>I got the same smap. Ignored it mostly.

Interestingly, you weren&#039;t the &quot;trusted reference&quot;, which in my case was Gavin Heaton (servantofchaos).

I was tempted to note this as another failure of social media and marketing in Australia, but I figured I&#039;d been enough of a curmudgeon this year.

It&#039;s good to see PM are on to fixing this, but even if the campaign had been not spammy, I find it offensive and annoying to be contacted by a brand/agency and not a human within them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the same smap. Ignored it mostly.</p>
<p>Interestingly, you weren’t the “trusted reference”, which in my case was Gavin Heaton (servantofchaos).</p>
<p>I was tempted to note this as another failure of social media and marketing in Australia, but I figured I’d been enough of a curmudgeon this year.</p>
<p>It’s good to see PM are on to fixing this, but even if the campaign had been not spammy, I find it offensive and annoying to be contacted by a brand/agency and not a human within them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodge</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119476</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119476</guid>
		<description>Dixie

The &#039;spam&#039; part is getting unsolicited email.

The mis-use part is not abiding by the license clearly stated on my site; and not seeking permission to &#039;reference&#039; sell a product based on my endorsement. 

Also, the email sent out made it seem like I endorsed the product: and this was done without my permission. The recipients actually thought I had given you their email address: sort of like network selling. A concept I totally abhor.

Finally, there was no human/contact details at your end to call/email/fax ... to talk to. ANY company wanting to do &quot;social&quot; stuff needs to realise it is about real humans. Not call centres, blank emails etc. etc.

I class this as fail. Epic Fail.

On the Metamucil side: I own enough for the moment, and would prefer to remain aloof from endorsement.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dixie</p>
<p>The ‘spam’ part is getting unsolicited email.</p>
<p>The mis-use part is not abiding by the license clearly stated on my site; and not seeking permission to ‘reference’ sell a product based on my endorsement. </p>
<p>Also, the email sent out made it seem like I endorsed the product: and this was done without my permission. The recipients actually thought I had given you their email address: sort of like network selling. A concept I totally abhor.</p>
<p>Finally, there was no human/contact details at your end to call/email/fax … to talk to. ANY company wanting to do “social” stuff needs to realise it is about real humans. Not call centres, blank emails etc. etc.</p>
<p>I class this as fail. Epic Fail.</p>
<p>On the Metamucil side: I own enough for the moment, and would prefer to remain aloof from endorsement.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewen</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119474</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119474</guid>
		<description>I am really curious to hear an explanation of how you &quot;accidentally&quot; send spam in this manner. Spam is spam, no matter what spin you put on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really curious to hear an explanation of how you “accidentally” send spam in this manner. Spam is spam, no matter what spin you put on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixie</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119473</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119473</guid>
		<description>Hello Nick,
This is not spam but simply a mix up with our IT dept (the email account was set up incorrectly). We are sending out Metamucil Fibresure Xmas gift packs to a few key bloggers so they can try it for themselves. We mentioned your blog in our message because you are well regarded in the blogosphere.

Sorry for the mix-up, the email address is fully functioning now. If you are interested, let us know and we will send you an Xmas pack too.

Cheers.
Dixie
Producer - Publicis Digital</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Nick,<br />
This is not spam but simply a mix up with our IT dept (the email account was set up incorrectly). We are sending out Metamucil Fibresure Xmas gift packs to a few key bloggers so they can try it for themselves. We mentioned your blog in our message because you are well regarded in the blogosphere.</p>
<p>Sorry for the mix-up, the email address is fully functioning now. If you are interested, let us know and we will send you an Xmas pack too.</p>
<p>Cheers.<br />
Dixie<br />
Producer — Publicis Digital</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellery</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119467</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119467</guid>
		<description>Yeh, saying &quot;sorry for the spam&quot; doesn&#039;t change the fact that you&#039;re spamming people. And surely Publicis Mojo realised having the sender&#039;s name appear as &quot;Blog Seeding&quot; in an email instead of an actual real human&#039;s name would make bloggers go &quot;WTF, spammer?&quot;.

I&#039;d be interested to see whats in the gift pack for said &#039;fibre products&#039;. Hodge... since you&#039;re &#039;particularly influential in the blogosphere&#039;, can you get me one? I could use some metamucil branded beach towels. And some sweet smelling orange coloured soaps for the toilet maybe good? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh, saying “sorry for the spam” doesn’t change the fact that you’re spamming people. And surely Publicis Mojo realised having the sender’s name appear as “Blog Seeding” in an email instead of an actual real human’s name would make bloggers go “WTF, spammer?”.</p>
<p>I’d be interested to see whats in the gift pack for said ‘fibre products’. Hodge… since you’re ‘particularly influential in the blogosphere’, can you get me one? I could use some metamucil branded beach towels. And some sweet smelling orange coloured soaps for the toilet maybe good? <img src='http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewen</title>
		<link>http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783/comment-page-1#comment-119466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2783#comment-119466</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t that give you the sh...  sorry. couldn&#039;t resist.

If you&#039;re in Australia you can report spam to the ACMA - http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_310294

I have reported to them in the past and they have addressed my complaints every time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn’t that give you the sh…  sorry. couldn’t resist.</p>
<p>If you’re in Australia you can report spam to the ACMA — <a href="http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_310294" rel="nofollow">http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_310294</a></p>
<p>I have reported to them in the past and they have addressed my complaints every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

