www.nickhodge.com

microsoft, munging and on being a mercurial iconoclastic professional geek.

Archive for the ‘atnickhodge’ Category

atNickHodge Episode 12: Mark Pesce

with one comment

The future is intan­gible. It fas­cin­ates us all. In this epis­ode of atNick­Hodge, I inter­view Mark Pesce.

If we could get someone to read us our future, with cer­tainty, we would cer­tainly leap at the chance. It impacts the low­est base needs of our Maslowian needs of secur­ity and safety. Know­ing the future provides a com­fort to our present.

Ulti­mately, the future may be the only thing we humans can­not touch, can­not see, can­not meas­ure; and for the masses, can­not dir­ectly effect.

The role of a futur­ist is a mod­ern day equi­val­ent of a celtic druid; an indian shaman. The gypsy for­tune teller. Someone who sees the present through dif­fer­ent glasses and extra­pol­ates a non-Wolframic line of poten­ti­al­ity. Some­where that is now known, in the present mind.

But by the sheer act of shin­ing a light in one dim corner of a future; the cock­roaches scuttle out; and there is a poten­tial that the futur­ist has Heisenberg’d that reality.

A futur­ist has a chal­len­ging act. In a small way a court’s jester: not to be the clown: but rather the only one freely per­mit­ted to speak their mind. Call the present for what it is — and to determ­ine the health of Schroedinger’s cat . In what dra­matic ways will the present change a poten­tial future.

Risk can be described as the myriad of things can hap­pen, which is more than was even­tu­ally does hap­pen. Know­ing the future reduces risk, or detail­ing a future helps tickle out the poten­tial futures. Good and bad.

Futur­ists, such as Mark, have this respons­ib­il­ity to shake up the people and power in the present. Ensure that a neg­at­ive future is aver­ted as we jour­ney down the dirty path of now within the dark forest of reality.

Written by Nick Hodge

May 21st, 2009 at 9:58 pm

atNickHodge Episode 11: @zuzu Punk Rock Changed My Life

without comments

An excel­lent ROCKING PUNK ROCK show with Susan Mac­Gil­li­v­ray (@zuzu on twit­ter)

A fur­ther piece of home­work for you all is this 1991 doc­u­ment­ary. Also this Bob Rock inter­view about Van­couver Punk Scene.

OK, I stuffed up the most import­ant thing at the begin­ning - audio (embar­rass­ing as @fang and I had dis­cussed this earlier in the day); but thank­fully deks caught that and I fixed it on the fly. @zuzu was such a great guest: she spent the last 6 days col­lat­ing data after work ready for the show. And obvi­ously she had plenty of stor­ies to tell.

Another great thing was see­ing @zuzu recon­nect with her old Van­couver Punk scene friends over the internets.

@zuzu has an excel­lent post detail­ing why she chose the fol­low­ing songs in her MIX

To revisit the scene, here are a list of @zuzu’s PICK-and-MIX:

Band Song
Clash Clash City Rockers
Ramones Pin­head
XRay Spex The Day the World Turned Dayglo
Husker Du Whatever
DOA Hard­core 81
The Damned Neat Neat Neat
Young Cana­dians Hawaii
DOA STATS

Siouxie and the Banshees

Hong Kong Garden
Dead Kennedys Hyper­act­ive child
Joy Divi­sion Digital
Germs Man­imal
Slow Against the Glass
Des­cend­ents I Like Food
Iggy Pop I Wanna Be Your Dog
Mod­er­nettes Bar­bra
The Cramps Tear It Up
Wire Ex Lion Tamer
Rez­il­los Somebody’s Gonna Get Their Head Kicked in Tonight
Buzz­cocks Bore­dom
Killing Joke Ward­ance
Minute­men This aint no picnic
Dead Kennedys Hol­i­day in Cambodia
Black Flag Depres­sion (with Ron)
X Jonny Hit and Run Pauline
Stiff Little Fingers Sus­pect Device

Written by Nick Hodge

May 14th, 2009 at 9:46 pm

atNickHodge Episode 10: Theology of the Cluetrain with Stephen Collins (@trib)

without comments

Show plan for Epis­ode 10, 7th May 2009 #atNick­Hodge “Theology of the Cluetrain“
  1. [at 8:35pm] Theo­logy of the Cluetrain
    1. Intro­du­cing our Spe­cial Guest this even­ing, Stephen Collins from Acid­Labs
      1. (ask Stephen his background)
      2. long exper­i­ence in web, html, ux, ia…
      3. which/what event put you onto cluetrain?
    2. Today: #pub­lic­sphere
      1. How is the Govt going with this internet/social thing?
      2. are they doing any­thing at all?
        1. vs. con­trolled mes­sage of previous+current govt
      3. Is @piawaugh’s addi­tion of Sen­ator Kate Lundy — indic­ates what; is it an ACT elect­or­ate thing? purely political?
      4. a brave move Min­is­ter, open gov­ern­ment” / Yes, Min­is­ter (first episode)
    3. The Cluetrain Mani­festo
      1. 95 theses as a call-to-action / mani­festo : busi­ness in the inter­net age
        1. vs. 95 theses of Mar­tin Luther 1517; start of the Prot­est­ant Her­it­age in Europe (vs. Lol­lards) fight­ing against the power of the Holy Roman Cath­olic Church
      2. The mani­festo was writ­ten in 1999 by Rick Lev­ine, Chris­topher Locke, Doc Searls, and David Wein­ber­ger
        1. Pre-dates Web 1.0 (dot-com boom) Web 2.0 (R/W) and Social Media!
          1. Around David Winer, scripting.com (early blog­ging in 1996/7)
          2. I first met Dave in 1993.
          3. many of these, IT industry spe­cific; aimed at Apple and Microsoft
      3. 8 “sec­tions“
        1. Theses 1 – 6: Mar­kets are Con­ver­sa­tions
          - mass media sub­ver­ted the “vil­lage mar­ket” .. inter­net returns us to this concept. Inform­a­tion in mar­kets drives to bet­ter sta­bil­ity
          Thesis 7: Hyper­links Sub­vert Hier­archy
          - SM: any­one can reach out, out­side PR
          Theses 8–13: Con­nec­tion between the new mar­kets and com­pan­ies
          - SM: example, mini-microsoft on recent rounds
          Theses 14 – 25: Organ­iz­a­tions enter­ing the mar­ket­place
          - ‘voice’ is the cul­ture, fit­ting in; not attempt­ing to dominate/control
          Theses 26 — 40: Mar­ket­ing & Organ­iz­a­tional Response
          - authen­ti­city
          Theses 41 — 52: Intranets and the impact to organ­iz­a­tion con­trol and struc­ture
          - fails to under­stand flow of respons­ib­il­ity; tied to risk/reward
          Theses 53 — 71: Con­nect­ing the Inter­net mar­ket­place with cor­por­ate Intranets
          - voice, again in SM con­text
          Theses 72 — 95: New Mar­ket Expect­a­tions
          - expect­a­tion change
      4. (John C Dvorak) Is it just a Circle-jerk of Burn­ing Man attendees
        1. and left-wing wingnuts?
      5. OK, voices: the voice of gov­ern­ment, plainly sucks. PR speak etc. Mes­sages in 15 seconds
      6. where does the need for trans­par­ency come from?
    4. what other books/people have you read?
    5. Cur­rent “mar­ket­ing” ori­ented approach and “p0wnership” needs to be stopped!
      1. Cul­tural change
        “con­nec­ted ori­ented” <———————————-> “con­ver­sa­tion ori­ented“
        plat­form of “social media” as a replace­ment to “msm” (tra­di­tional media)
      2. Con­nec­tion ori­ented is char­ac­ter­ised by the num­ber of people that see a viral ad; insert­ing this into the high end of the SM world, and watch­ing it expand due to the net­work effect. Get­ting as many views as pos­sible. No care as to the actual con­tent of the con­ver­sa­tion.

        Cluetrain

        This has its place, but its not “social media” » cf “Tele­vi­sion depart­ment” in Mad Men

        digitial mar­ket­ing industry” is too much on the left of the above scale as they do not under­stand cus­tom­ers or employ­ees.
         

It is a whole-of-organisation cul­tural change.

The dis­con­nect is here.
 

    1. concept of reflect­ive trans­par­ency: trans­par­ency exists out­side the organ­isa­tion, whether you like it or not
  • how does this apply to a non-commercial organisation?
  • http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/05/01/1533216
    1. Sun employee doc­u­ment­ing top 10 reas­ons for Sun #fail vs. SEC implications
    2. @wacom @msretail argu­ment vs. MS policy on blog­ging (vs. SM)
  • Fun­da­ment­al­ist person-oriented social media
    1. partly due to my own suc­cess and per­sona, per­son­al­ity and cult thereof
  • approach to POSM within large organisations
    1. per­sonal brand vs. cor­por­ate brand?
  • find­ing the middle ground
  • [9:24pm] End­ing thoughts
    1. Here is the elev­ator pitch: For as long as an organisation’s products and or ser­vices have exis­ted, con­stitu­ents have been talk­ing. About the products, the price, the ser­vice they get; value, ease of deal­ing with you. Their per­sonal asso­ci­ation with the company.And these con­ver­sa­tions are across the range from pos­it­ive or neg­at­ive. Tra­di­tional mar­ket­ing aims and claims to pen­et­rate the mind, and have influ­ence over these utter­ances. Sales people argue and nego­ti­ate around them, or to rein­force them. PR works with the influ­en­cers to influ­ence.

      about you are now vis­ible to mil­lions, if not bil­lions. A search engine search away. We are hyper­con­nec­ted and hyper­share our exper­i­ences. Pho­tos, videos or snip­pets of life com­pressed into 140 char­ac­ters. Lit­er­ally and Instantly. And they are per­man­ent. And they are find­able.Of course there are inde­pend­ent voices; voices tra­di­tion­ally called journ­al­ists. There are sub­ject­ive voices in caco­phony: SM from the organ­isa­tion out. A tra­di­tional mar­ket, if you have vis­ited one, is noisy.

      your organ­isa­tion, can choose to listen, or be a part of this con­ver­sa­tion, act­ively choose to block it out. Ignore it. This choice is ulti­mately yours to make. Like all busi­ness decisions, you will need more inform­a­tion to make a rational choice.  Are your con­stitu­ents online? Is the effort worth the invest­ment?  Can you risk to your repu­ta­tion by ignor­ing it?And here is the most fright­en­ing ques­tion of all: are they talk­ing about you at all?

      The school­yard and tea kit­chen in our officespaces are online, in the clouds of the internet.

      The voices? Can you hear them?

  • Written by Nick Hodge

    May 12th, 2009 at 10:21 am

    atNickHodge Episode 9: The Australian Constitution: with Peter Black, QuT

    without comments

     

    Thanks to Deks and Peter Black for an edu­ca­tional show.

    Rough Pro­duc­tion notes from this show:

    OHAI, TEH INTERWEBS. Wel­come to #atNick­Hodge, “Aus­tralian Con­sti­tu­tion. Yes, We have one“
    Meta-backchannel Pro­du­cer is Dekrazee1: thanks! dir­ect Qs to her in the chat, and we’ll get ‘em sent to us via the meta Backchan­nel
    Kit­tehs: new agent, now requir­ing appear­ance fees.
    The tshirt avail­able from crikey.com.au @firstdogonmoon
    #zom­bieguineapig­flu — Chat with Emmah Klein, an old work col­league, mum of two kids under 5; Whoop­ing Cough in Day Care — source The World Today — Wed­nes­day, 11 March , 2009
    ABC Radio reporter: Meredith Grif­fiths Six weeks ago, a baby died of Whoop­ing cough in New South Wales, the first such death in more than eight years. Dr Jeremy McAn­ulty, dir­ector of the Com­mu­nic­able Dis­eases of NSW Health: He says there were more than 3000 cases of whoop­ing cough in the first two months of this year, com­pared to just under 450 in the same period last year.
    The last big out­break of whoop­ing cough was in 1997 when nine people died across Aus­tralia.
    Quick recap on last week “The Lost Uncles“
    Alan Seymour’s play “One Day of the Year” (1960) 1983, how many minds did this infect?
    rehigh­light; feed­back on the topic
    Mike Sey­fang @fang’s mes­sage
    strange obser­va­tion on the chat, it seems people might be listen­ing. Inter­est­ing, and I am humbled: thanks
    This show comes from my learn­ing that the exec­ut­ive powers over the Mil­it­ary Forces is held in the hands of the Governor-General.
    Tonight to help me in light of my per­sonal Con­sti­tu­tional Crisis, I have Peter Black, Lec­turer in Con­sti­tu­tional Law, Queens­land Uni­ver­sity of Tech­no­logy
    [at 8:35pm] Aus­tralian Con­sti­tu­tion. Yes, We have one
    Intro­du­cing our Spe­cial Guest this even­ing, Peter Black
    Polit­ics at all levels, includ­ing the US
    Why does Peter love teach­ing the law?
    Move from Internet/IP Law to Con­sti­tu­tional Law. Why not Con­tract Law or Crim­inal Law, or even Cor­por­ate Law
    Can you tell a Con­sti­tu­tional Law stu­dent vs. Cor­por­a­tions Law?
    Is it that High Court / Con­sti­tu­tional Law seems to cover all of these bases?
    Ques­tion: Social media, MSM activ­it­ies and QuT: clear guidelines in place?
    Back to Basics 2. Civic His­tory
    From His­tory: Australia’s makeup (States), col­on­ised and incor­por­ated sep­ar­ately through 18th and 19th cen­tur­ies
    Push to nation­al­ise Aus­tralia from 1880: Sir Henry Parkes (Ten­ter­field Ora­tion, rail­way guages as an example); fol­lowed by Deakin VIC, Bar­ton NSW (law­yers) as drivers; with other drafters of sec­tions.
    Stalled in the 1880s due an eco­nomic depres­sion (almost sent Bar­ton broke)
    Post 1892 more of a pop­u­list move to Fed­er­a­tion (Bar­ton lead, not pro­fes­sional politi­cians)
    Rise of labour move­ments in par­al­lel with fed­er­al­ism
    Vari­ous con­fer­ences, drafts from 1890 through to the final
    Many inter-State pres­sures: NSW wanted free trade, Vic­toria wanted pro­tec­tion­ism.
    Paro­chi­al­ism SA, WA, TAS (note: Qld, Bris­bane was not in favour!)
    NZ atten­ded one of the first con­fer­ences in 1890
    Treaty of Wait­angi with the Maori poten­tially pre­cluded this? More a dif­fer­ent sense of iden­tity.
    Pur­posely neg­lected to Con­sti­tu­tion­ally describe what are “reserve powers“
    Assump­tion was made that these powers were reflec­ted and incor­por­ated the same con­cepts of respons­ible gov­ern­ment as to the Brit­ish par­lia­ment
    Does this provide a level of flex­ib­il­ity in our sys­tem?
    State-based Ref­er­en­dums through late 19th cen­tury
    White men only in the vot­ing? yes! this is true. ouch!
    WA was “last state into” (by the skin of its teeth) the Con­sti­tu­tion and Fed­er­al­ism
    There seems to be a sub­text of anatag­on­ism from our WA cous­ins to the East coast
    wanted to do their own thing, inde­pend­ent streak.
    Can WA suc­ceed from the Fed­er­a­tion?
    In April 1934, a ref­er­en­dum in West­ern Aus­tralia pro­duced a 68% yes vote to leave the Com­mon­wealth of Aus­tralia with the aim of return­ing to the Brit­ish Empire as an autonom­ous ter­rit­ory. No action was taken in the Brit­ish Par­lia­ment because no request was received from the Aus­tralian Gov­ern­ment in line with the Stat­ute of West­min­ster.
    http://www.principality-hutt-river.com/
    The Act: Com­mon­wealth of Aus­tralia Con­sti­tu­tion Act 1900 (Imp), an Act of the Par­lia­ment of the United King­dom
    Bar­ton nego­ti­ated this through UK Par­lia­ment, First Aus­tralian PM, then moved on to the High Court
    Barton’s last minute Privy Coun­cil nego­ti­ation in rela­tion to “brit­ish com­mer­cial interests”:
    what is the Privy Coun­cil?
    1927: King in vs. King of
    1942: Stat­ute of West­min­ster 1931; Aus­tralia imple­men­ted in 1942: From Domin­ions to true Coun­tries; true legal sep­ar­a­tion (except for privy coun­cil)
    1986: Privy Coun­cil sep­ar­a­tion: High Court is the final arbiter of our laws
    Begs the ques­tion, when exactly were we our own coun­try? Are we this with “Queens Rep­res­ent­at­ive“
    I am a repub­lic­a­tion, thanks to form­at­ive 1980s movies Gal­lipoli and Breaker Mor­ant
    To Become a Repub­lic: does it require a Con­sti­tu­tional Change? Yes, have to be a ref­er­en­dum
    Does the UK have to do any­thing in their laws, or can we just bug­ger off?
    The Con­sti­tu­tion, as a doc­u­ment
    Chapters, with sec­tions
    Inter­est­ing parts
    Sec­tion 92 provides that “trade, com­merce, and inter­course among the States shall be abso­lutely free”. The pre­cise mean­ing of this phrase is the sub­ject of a con­sid­er­able body of law.
    The exec­ut­ive power is ves­ted in the Governor-General “as the Queen’s rep­res­ent­at­ive” (Sec­tion 61), as is the command-in-chief of the armed forces (Sec­tion 68)
    cf: con­sti­tion­al­ity of the Great Fire­wall of Aus­tralia
    Divi­sion of powers: State vs Fed­eral
    1920 Har­vester case in terms of state vs fed­eral powers/equal?
    Move to Fed­er­al­ism
    external powers (Sec­tion 51(xxix) of the Aus­tralian Con­sti­tu­tion)
    in rela­tion to inter­na­tional treat­ies (Tas world her­it­age area)
    Cor­por­a­tions Law in 1980s
    The court sys­tem
    (state court sys­tems)
    Fed­eral Court (mat­ter of Fed­eral law)
    High Court of Aus­tralia
    High Court is last court in Aus­tralia for all court cases
    High Court judges auto­mat­ic­ally ‘retire’ at 70; less chance of gam­ing the sys­tem with polit­ical appointees (vs. US sys­tem)
    Modification/Changes — move­ments of change
    Does the concept of Com­mon Law apply, mod­i­fied by cases?
    How does this dif­fer from a Ref­er­en­dum style change? (8÷44 suc­cess rate of ref­er­en­dums)
    So, what do you actu­ally teach?
    It seems you could keep the con­sti­tu­tion + rel­ev­ant con­sti­tu­tional cases in your head
    Case Stud­ies:
    Express vs. implied freedoms
    apart from reli­gion etc, polit­ical free speech etc
    Leads onto “Bill of Rights” vs US sys­tem where the Bill is found­a­tional
    The Dis­missal: 1975 : Con­sti­tu­tional pinup case
    Queensland’s Joh star­ted it
    star­ted with sen­ate changes, from states, against con­ven­tion
    With­hold­ing of money
    Dimissal of exec­ut­ive gov­ern­ment; not done since 1834 (King Wil­liam IV)
    (yes) Chapter II, ‘reserve powers’ but are lim­ited by con­ven­tion? WTF is con­ven­tion and reserve power

    Written by Nick Hodge

    April 30th, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    Posted in atnickhodge,history

    atNickHodge Episode 8: The Lost Uncles

    with 2 comments

    Review­ing the Show

    • Too many umms and errs again. Got to remem­ber to shut up when think­ing. Silence for sub-seconds are ok. Could blame the slack­ness on my neck being out caus­ing vagueness.
    • More mod­u­la­tion in emo­tion when speaking
    • Tim­ing worked well. Missed the mid-point video due to time restrictions.
    • Ten minutes before the show began, I restruc­tured the flow (swap­ping Hodge and Roberts) for dra­matic and story effect. A change that ulti­mately worked
    • Post-show review­ing the chat stream: the amount of chat­ter vs. the viewer count seems to indic­ate people are listen­ing. This seems to make my show a little less enter­tain­ment and more documentary/educational. Cool.
    • The quo­ta­tion from C.E.W. Bean at the end, which I had heard on a TV doc­u­ment­ary and quickly found the ori­ginal online, was a per­fect book-end to the show. Very mov­ing paragraph.

    The Lost Uncles

    Show Notes: These are the notes that I use to prompt me as I am present­ing the show. The notes are not sen­tences, they are prompt­ing phrases. There is usu­ally extra inform­a­tion in the notes I do not get to men­tion­ing. This is also good prac­tice for SEO. Search engines can­not (yet) get inside the video.

    Mid last year, Angus Hodge, the 1st per­son I will talk about tonight, appeared in an online per­sonal fam­ily his­tory site. Lis­ted as a WW1 vet­eran.
    Wow, lead me on a jour­ney through per­sonal histories.

    National Archives of Aus­tralia http://www.naa.gov.au/
    http://mappingouranzacs.naa.gov.au/
    Provides ALL WW1 vet­eran per­son­nel doc­u­ments online
    Can request WW2 details to be scanned and put into online (you pay, gets shared!)

    Aus­tralian War Memorial online lib­rary: deeper research and unit his­tor­ies
    daily war diar­ies of WW1 units; writ­ten by the officers over­view of the maps, move­ments, people and mil­it­ary events. Engage­ments are also detailed. Down to the “Com­pany” ~ 100 men.

    Book: Les Carlyon, on The Great War; largely fol­lows the offi­cial his­tor­ies, with polit­ical ‘col­our’
    Charles E. W. Bean: offi­cial his­tor­ian, very humble man ‘of his time’ ; wrote of the individuals

    More than read­ing the his­tory books
    Peter Fitz­si­mons, excel­lent books on Tobruk and Kokoda, with indi­vidual stor­ies weaved into the big­ger pic­ture.
    http://anzacday.gov.au/

    Band-of-Brothers: it is greater than unit, coun­try: it is about your mates. The guys next to you, around you
    Thank the late Stephen Ambrose for the books
    Many of these men remem­ber their time: intens­ity, stay together. Some say the only people who really under­stand what they have gone through are their war colleau­ges.
    Aus­tralian sol­diers talked of Mate­ship and Cob­bers; but ulti­mately looked after num­ber 1.

    No Geo-politics tonight, this is not about the Gen­er­als and Majors; nor the polit­ic­ans
    Espe­cially rehash­ing the stor­ies of Gal­lipoli and Kokoda
    ABC’s Gal­lipoli web site is excellent

    Will cover some lar­ger back­ground where appro­pri­ate; but only as an aside.

    Nor mil­it­ary tech­no­logy, the gen­er­als and majors, and the military-industry com­plex

    Per­son­ally I’ve had a fas­cin­a­tion with WW2, His­tory and the Tech­no­logy since I was about 10 years old. Con­tin­ues to this day, and passed on some of that interest to Liam.

    Con­trary to the 1970s school­ing of seem­ingly “for­get­ting” the war; was shunned as a topic, even in his­tory as it was felt that we were glor­i­fy­ing war; even the gen­eral study of his­tory itself was shunned.

    When I was 8, learnt about Gal­lipoli (Simpson and his Don­key) and that was about it. Pretty benign view of the hor­rors of Gal­lipoli.
    Gal­lipoli is described as a “birth of a nation” » many sen­ti­ments come from Bean
    Aus­tralia was born in 1901.
    Aus­tralia was a teen­ager at the time of Gal­lipoli.
    It is here, as a teen­ager, we real­ised the world is big, dan­ger­ous
    And our par­ents are not infallible.

    It is the impact on the people after­wards. These impacts are sig­ni­fic­ant, and they linger.
    Also note that 207,000 Aus­trali­ans killed/wounded out of 330,000 sol­diers. That’s a 65% cas­u­alty rate. Highest in Brit­ish empire
    West­ern Front: 5,500 men cas­u­al­ties at Fro­melles: first major battle for ANZACs in France, one divi­sion, one night cf. Gal­lipoli over 28,000 cas­u­al­it­ies in 9 month cam­paign
    Aus­trali­ans had been used, much as the Cana­dians, as shock troops by the Brit­ish com­mand wherever the line was most threatened, or where there was need to mount an attack.
    The impact of WW1 across Australia’s pop­u­la­tion: massive, endur­ing
    Wondered about psych makeup of John Win­ston Howard who’s father, grand­father and mother’s father served in WW1.

    Lyall Howard diar­ist from WW1 front lines (doc­u­ments) ; 19 years old, accep­ted even under­height
    In battle, Lyall Howard was wounded by a mus­tard gas attack in Passchendaele and spent 10 weeks in hos­pital.[1][8] The gass­ing caused chronic bron­chitis and skin rashes which would con­tinue to plague him after the war (died of bron­chitis aged 59)
    “Lest We For­get” We must not for­get. When any­one dies, remem­ber­ing is important

    Per­sonal Mil­it­ary Her­it­age: Two late mater­nal great-Uncles who served in WW2 (Trans­port, Admin­is­tra­tion), Uncle post WW2 Aus­tralian Army, Father in RAN for 9 years. In essence, I am a navy brat (up to age of 5, any­ways)
    Stor­ies of an long-lost Uncle on my late mater­nal grandmother’s side who was “lost” in the Second Boer War. But I can­not find evid­ence of this at the moment; not lis­ted in the SA Boer war sol­diers. Unless he was a Boer, which is pos­sible.
    Movies such as Breaker Mor­ant and Gal­lipoli were form­at­ive of my world view

    Touch­ing RAAF-crewed Lan­caster in Imper­ial War Museum
    More recent research: Three of my Dad’s Great Uncles (and one Aunty) served in the (Army, RAAF) CMF within AU dur­ing WW2
    Lonely Aunties: ladies who lost their fiances, hus­bands, fath­ers and sons

    The impact lasts longer; the growth of CWA; lonely ladies with long memor­ies
    Wives of those who returned, who dealt with the silence and other impacts
    Women played an import­ant at-home role in both WW1 and WW2 ; ulti­mately drove many fem­in­ist reforms in the 20th century

    Tonight: stor­ies of Hodge, Lock, Mason and Roberts

    Angus Hodge
    http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/2564

    Angus Hodge, aged 18 years and 2 months, Labourer of Laura South Aus­tralia
    Pine Spring near, Laura, South Australia

    SA ID B2824
    assigned to D Coy, 43rd Bat­talion, 11th Bri­gade, 3rd Divi­sion: Monash’s boys (note: Lyall Howard, Sig­nals in 3rd Division)

    http://www.naa.gov.au/collection/explore/defence/service-records/army-wwi.aspx
    Note: when read­ing the indi­vidual reports you see lots of “sick, hos­pital” .. fails to show what hap­pens on the line; best to be found in the War Diar­ies
    http://www.awm.gov.au/units/unit_11230.asp
    43rd Bat­talion War Diar­ies: http://www.awm.gov.au/diaries/ww1/folder.asp?folder=984

    16/12/1916 “Ber­rima” to Devon­port, UK (this ship was tor­pedoed off Port­land 18 Feb­ru­ary 1917)
    20÷1÷1917 Ship Hos­pital Sick, recur­ring Mumps dur­ing first year over­seas.
    11÷3÷1917 Joined 11th Bri­gade in UK
    16÷4÷1917 Mumps recurred (Park­house)
    4÷5÷1917 Dis­charged to “2nd Tng Bn Dur­ring­ton“
    30÷7÷1917 Southamp­ton to France 11th Bri­gade to 3rd Divi­sion Base Depot Rouelles
    24÷8÷1917 to 43 Bttn from Depot

    [Btn train­ing in August and Septem­ber]
    [22/9/1917 Sir Douglas Haig vis­ited and inspec­ted the 3rd Divi­sion Sol­diers never saw the Brit­ish Gen­er­als at the front, not­ing qual­ity of Mon­ash as a leader; com­pared to Sir Keith Mur­doch (acted both as a journ­al­ist and govt agent in Lon­don), father of Rupert; and Charles E. W. Bean , fam­ous Aus­tralian War His­tor­ian; was offi­cial war cor­res­pond­ent in 1914. ]

    [from War Diary: 2nd Oct: Menin Road near Ypres; north of, known as Zon­nebeke Attack , a part of Poly­gon Wood. 2am No man’s land, 6am, zero hour, took first line 800 yards.

    DCoy formed fin­ish line, CCoy in sup­port; DCoy, right flank expec­ted the most action. DCoy lost 2 officers before ‘jump­ing off’. The toll on officers dur­ing these cam­paigns is staggering

    4÷10÷1917 wounded same place, Ypres; away 3 days at Field Ambu­lance, returned to unit 4 days later
    8÷10÷1917 returned from schrapnel leg wound; time to move to Bre­men Redoubt in Ypres Salient

    16th Octo­ber 1917 43rd had 40 men gassed (mus­tard) near Zon­nebeke whilst work­ing on a railway

    [Nov: com­pany train­ing, Moved to Canteen Corner]

    24/11/1917 to Hos­pital Sick (NYD) -> not yet determ­ined; prob­ably Flu
    28/11/1917 returned to 43 Bttn

    [Canteen Corner to the Line (trenches) Bois Grenier]

    1÷1÷1918 to Hos­pital Sick (PUO) -> Fever (back and forth)
    23÷2÷1918 returned to 43 Bttn, to the trenches at le Bizet

    1÷3÷1918 On leave in the UK

    [from March sum­mary: “for 4 months after Ypres, the 43rd had been in and out of the quiet sec­tors of Bois Gren­ier and Le Bizet” … added 250 men in Dec 1917, but many were older, aged soldiers]

    20÷3÷1918 returned to 43 Bttn, just in time to defend against Ger­man Spring Offens­ive (Oper­a­tion Michael)

    22÷3÷1918 moved to Heilly in the Somme

    [30/3/1918 attack, rebuffed the same day, Ger­man Oper­a­tion Michael]

    [31st May 1918 Mon­ash now Aus­tralian Corps com­mander, that is all Aus­tralian sol­diers on the West­ern Front. 5 Divi­sions, under Aus­tralian com­mand: as wanted by sol­diers and politicians]

    [Villers-Bretonneux; “vee-ay bre­toner”: Phos­gene and Yel­low Cross/Mustard dur­ing May; Dur­ing May, 25% of A-Company repor­ted PUO. MO’s report states a pla­toon by pla­toon infec­tion, Reg Insp can­not determ­ine ‘flu, trench fever or PUO. May a total of 80 PUO cases evac­u­ated from 43rd. 190 gas cas­u­al­it­ies at end of May. Out of the line late June]

    [17/5/1918 Sir Douglas Haig, Gen­eral Officer Com­mand­ing inspec­ted DCoy, Allonville]

    [3rd June: attack on 43rd, VB. Loss of 230 men (639 officers and ranks in early June!) in gas shelling of 25th and 26th May, con­sol­id­ated D into ABC com­pan­ies dur­ing May. DCoy was in the front line, most gas fell behind the lines. Rations pur­chased from money sup­plied from SA, from trade com­mis­sioner in Lon­don dur­ing June]

    27th in sup­port (Wil­liam Roberts above in 27th)

    [1/7/1918 addi­tion of Amer­ican troops; Per­sh­ing with­drew 1000 before the attack]

    [4/7/1918 attack on Hamel ; extens­ive plan­ning by Mon­ash; DCoy was reformed and propped up with Amer­ic­ans; some 1000 used across this attack; some used to take pris­on­ers rear­ward and mop up; E Coy 131st Reg US Inf]

    [July 1918 attack on Hamel; Aus­trali­ans were the most exper­i­enced sol­diers on the West­ern front; not determ­ined by rank. 11th used north of Hamel; Mark V tanks used in the attack ; plus air­craft. “Early Blitzkrieg”, as copied by Guderian in the inter-war years; ]

    The tac­tical meth­ods had been tested by the Aus­trali­ans in a local counter-attack at the Battle of Hamel on 4 July. The Ger­man defend­ers of Hamel were deeply dug in, and their pos­i­tion com­manded a very wide field of fire. Sim­ilar pos­i­tions had res­isted cap­ture for two months in the Battle of the Somme. The Aus­trali­ans had used sur­prise rather than weight at Hamel. The artil­lery had opened fire only at the moment the infantry and tanks advanced, and the Ger­mans were rap­idly over­run (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Amiens)

    4÷8÷1918 Cor­bie, biv­ou­acs behind the line; dur­ing August Angus was 1 of 7 wounded out of 67 fight­ing strength.

    5÷8÷1918 Start of 93 minute attack; 437 cas­u­al­it­ies; at the time, most suc­cess­ful com­bined oper­a­tion at the time.

    11th Bgd were the northern-most (nearest Somme River) attack Battle of Amiens

    Bash­ing against the Ger­mans 2–3 times a day; August and Septem­ber were the toughest battle time for the Anzacs on the West­ern Front; whilst attacks were bet­ter planned and more com­bined. Chalk and cheese com­pared to the Somme in 1916; ulti­mately were a spent force by Octo­ber 1918.

    March through Novem­ber 23% of all pris­on­ers cap­tured, 20% of the ground. Only 10% of the Brit­ish army

    5÷8÷1918 repor­ted in Hos­pital Sick — Embarked to UK within a few days (inval­ided)
    10÷8÷1918 Admit­ted to St Johns, Chel­ten­ham: Old Wounded Leg, Slight (place of cas­u­al­ity: Bristol)

    [frac­ture 1912 due to fall from horse wound right shin bone at site of old injury away 3 days at field ambu­lance, return to unit. July 1918 wound broke down. evac­u­ated, no operation]

    24/10/1918 Furlo (R&R)
    9÷11÷1918 returned to No 4 Depot (Class B1 A2)
    16/11/1918 to 18/11/1918 “AWOL”, but dis­missed by Major [note: oth­ers AWOL, too post Armistance]
    11/12/1918 “Saxon” returned to Aus­tralia
    26÷2÷1919 Keswick Army Gen­eral Hos­pital
    29÷3÷1919 dis­charged from the AIF 20% disability

    Stor­ies of sol­diers return­ing to employ­ment 2 weeks after return­ing from the war. Ted Smee; repor­ted 1924 fall­ing to the ground and vomit­ing dur­ing a fire­works attack; nervous break­downs. It las­ted longer than the 4 years, and what was gained?

    [get­ting death cer­ti­fic­ate; seems he didnt move far from the farm with his par­ents upon his return]
    23÷3÷1920 bur­ied, Geor­getown. Fell from farm­ing equip­ment, head injury.

    Temp. Sar­geant Albert Earn­est Lock
    http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1886

    6th April 1917 — Assigned 102 How­itzer Bat­tery, a part of 2nd Field Artil­lery Bri­gade, 1st Divi­sion Artil­lery, Aus­tralian 1st Divison. He manned one of the 4 x 4.5 inch how­itzers in this Bat­tery. He was one of 71 other ranks; a part of one sec­tion, 116th How­itzer Bat­tery, also con­sist­ing of Major Har­ris and 2nd Lt C Groves.

    16th May 1916 — Pro­moted to Cor­poral from Gunner

    20th August 1917 — Pro­moted to Temp. Sgt from Corporal

    22th August 1917 — Wounded in Action, remained on duty (Bel­gium) The War Diary for the 1st Divi­sion Artil­lery has no enemy action on this date.

    Third Battle of Ypres

    Dur­ing this time, roads were clogged, dif­fi­cult to move the heavy guns.

    9th Octo­ber 1917 — Died of Wounds / Killed in Action from shrapnel through the heart; dur­ing the Battle of Poel­cap­pelle. (map) (a part of Passchendaele ). The 102 How­itzer Bat­tery was fir­ing on China Wood in a Search and Sweep at 11:27am. He was one of 9 ‘other ranks’ that died that week. This FAB was in action dur­ing these weeks of Octo­ber 1917 dur­ing the Third Battle of Ypres.

    Bur­ied at Huts Cemetery, Dick­e­busch (Dikke­bus), Bel­gium. (Divi­sional Diary of that Month); Plot 10, Row B, Grave 6.

    Father was Albert Lock, sta­tion­mas­ter at Bridge­wa­ter, South Aus­tralia. Mother Mary Jessie Ann Lock. Sis­ter, Sis­ter Majorie Ellen Lock. Lock was a Clerk in the Rail­ways for Eyre Pen­in­sula; as prior to and after WW1, a rail­way was pushed from Port Lin­coln up through the centre of Eyre Pen­in­sula. Hav­ing entered the Artil­lery, he was poten­tially mathematical/surveyer. It is pos­sible the town of Lock was one of many named by the SA Rail­ways of KIA from WW1.

    Lock is the lar­ger town I grew up near, and went to school in. I remem­ber the town memorial hall hav­ing a board con­tain­ing the men who served, and died, in WW1 from the area. And dusty pho­tos in the ante-rooms noone entered (except us kids) Then men deserved more than dusty pictures.

    Pilot Officer, Don­ald Wil­liam Mason. Born in Wagga, Lived in Orange, for the dur­a­tion of the war, his fam­ily lived in Bathurst.
    Research: Google Search Data

    http://cas.awm.gov.au/photograph/P01899.002
    MASON, Don­ald Wil­liam — (Pilot Officer); Ser­vice Num­ber — AUS 413220
    Born 28th Septem­ber 1918, Hairdresser and pastry chef; Mar­ried to Ann in 1938 and Daugh­ter xxx 1940 (liv­ing in Bathurst, wife and father in law at same address in Bathurst, 61 Kep­pel Street)
    Map Loc­a­tion
    Enlis­ted 16 August 1941
    Not admit­ted for sick­ness, no drunke­ness, AWOL. Lis­ted as VG (very good)
    DH82, Wir­raway; Qual­i­fied at Pilot 25th June 1942
    Arrived in the UK 18th Novem­ber 1942
    27 July 1943, Oper­a­tional 195 Sqdn, Change to 8th Feb­ru­ary 1944 198 Sqdn (both Hawker Typhoons)
    Typhoons: power­ful, yet large (7 tonnes); lots of arm­a­ment and rock­ets (ground attack)

    based at Thor­ney Island, UK (just to the east of Ports­mouth, UK)

    Map Loc­a­tion
    http://www.198squadronraf.co.uk/ (RAAF, RCAF and FF in the RAF unit)
    22nd March 1944, Com­mis­sioned at a Pilot Officer
    More than 100 sorties, includ­ing many prior to D-Day (6th June 1944)

    18th June 1944, lis­ted as miss­ing. Thury-Harcourt, France
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thury-Harcourt
    Map Loc­a­tion

    Shot down by Flak whilst attack­ing enemy trans­port
    http://www.198squadronraf.co.uk/198sqdn_047.htm
    Farmer had thought pilot had killed his father

    Plane, and P/O Mason not found until 1992; remembered at Arro­manches (49 years later)

    Map Loc­a­tion
    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=45563 (Boulon)
    Hodge trip to Nor­mandy; Band of Broth­ers, Liam and I had a per­sonal interest
    Our guide from http://Battlebus.fr/ , Geert, took us Musee de Embark­ment in Arro­manches
    He had worked at the museum, and knew the Head Cur­ator. Stat­ing we were from Aus­tralia, she took us to the dis­play of an RAAF uni­form. Of a “Don Mason”

    http://www.nickhodge.com/blog/archives/1304

    http://farm1.static.flickr.com/217/464787540_7158ffd8ce_b.jpg

    http://farm1.static.flickr.com/187/464795971_7bf3cdd5da_b.jpg

    http://farm1.static.flickr.com/232/464787288_c18431cb06.jpg

    Struck me: lone Aus­tralian in a sea of Cana­dian, French, Brit­ish, Amer­ican memor­ies; lost in France, with a wife and 2 year old at home.

    Private Wil­liam Her­bett Roberts

    Private Wil­liam Her­bett Roberts, South Aus­tralian Serial 5693; B-Company, 27th Bat­talion, 7th Bri­gade, 2nd Division

    Enlis­ted, 30÷1÷1916 (aged 18). Noted as a stock­man, from Sheringa, South Aus­tralia (less than 20km from where I lived as a kid on a farm). The area is noted for sheep sta­tions. And not much else

    Whilst in Adelaide bar­racks, as a stock­man and young; he was in the Base Light Horse for the months in the Army

    9÷12÷1916 27th Bttn in the field, near Flers on the Somme

    The 27th Bat­talion took part in two attacks to the east of Flers in the Somme Val­ley, both of which floundered in the mud. (the Maze, Novem­ber 1916)

    (Winter 1916/7 worst time in the field, cold­est in Europe for 40 years, much trench­foot, PUO; pyr­exia of unknown origin )

    14÷1÷1917 Trench­foot , 19÷1÷1917 To England

    March 1917 to 70th Bttn CMF (hold­ing Bttn) until Sept/Oct; 27th was “off the line” for most part of 1917

    11/10/1917 to France, Third Battle of Ypres; at the end of the campaign

    20/10/1917, just after Anzac Ridge, Above Ypres; removed back to Rail­way Wood, then Steenyorde
    Inter­est­ing note from Octo­ber 13th : “Court of Inquiry held re Cap­tain Hosking’s Horse lost a Ypres. Also re. miss­ing men.” The horse inq las­ted to next day; Roberts was one of “70 other ranks” join­ing the 27Btn from the 70Btn [BCoy, 15th rein­force­ments, 27th Btn]

    Ypres

    On/off the line / trenches

    Con­nect­ing the dots: Roberts (Anzac Ridge, Smiths Road between West­hoek and Zon­nebeke), Lock (Behind Anzac Ridge, Smiths Road between West­hoek and Zon­nebeke) and Hodge (Menenstaat)

    27/10/1917 West­hoek Ridge, Albert Redoubt to relieve 59th Btn
    29/10/1917 Chlor­ine and Mus­tard gas shelling, Patrol engage­ment around Celtic Wood
    2÷11÷1917 Off the line, relieved by 20th Btn
    1÷12÷1917 still off the line, Neue Eglise (diary notes v.cold)

    15/12/1917 Ploeg­steert , relieve 39th Btn; BCoy on right sec­tor
    20/12/1917 Phos­gene Gas (rab­bit erad­ic­a­tion in 1970s)
    24/12/1917 35th Btn Relieved 27th, Late Decem­ber, many detach­ments of work­ing parties to the front

    2÷1÷1918 returned to Ploeg­steert
    9÷1÷1918 25th Btn relived the 27 Btn

    27÷1÷1918 Locre, then Bell­brune
    Feb 1918 off the line, Hen­nevaux area train­ing
    March 1918 7th Bgd releive 9th Bgd at Kortepyp; quiet zone

    [21 March 1918, Oper­a­tion Michael, Ger­man counter-attack]

    April 1918 Albert Area on 9th (strength = 600 Officers and Ranks) ; more act­ive area of the line

    29÷4÷1918 7 Bgde relieved by 55th Eng­lish Bdge
    May 1918 Ami­ens area, train­ing
    19÷5÷1918 in reserve for 6 Bgd in Ancre, relieved by 26th Btn 26÷5÷1918

    5÷6÷1918 Sailley-le-Sec
    10÷6÷1918 attack
    26÷6÷1918 pulled back to Allon­ville
    27÷6÷1918 Villers-Bretonneaux ; in sup­port for 11 Bgd
    15÷7÷1918 Addressed by Lt Gen Sir John Mon­ash
    19÷7÷1918 relieved 23 Btn
    25÷7÷1918 Tron­ville Wood
    31÷7÷1918 788 Other Ranks in the Battalion

    1÷8÷1918 White Chat­eau
    8÷8÷1918 attack to the green line // First Battle of Ami­ens , biggest advance in allied move­ment and ground in WW1, “Black­est Day for Ger­many in WW1” // On 8 August, the bat­talion cap­tured 9 artil­lery pieces, 25 machine guns and over 200 pris­on­ers. // 7th Div first attack on first day.

    9÷8÷1918 4.30pm attack, with Tanks, jump­ing off point Harbonieres/Framerville area; fin­ished 5.20pm (a mere 50 minutes) (Rainecourt)
    9 hos­pit­al­ised wounded in this oper­a­tion (127 wounded, 28 killed) Second day of First Amiens

    9÷8÷1918 Oper­a­tion for removal of FB [for­eign body] in France 14 days, prior to Eng­land, 2 months recov­ery. One wound below, and slightly anterior to the left great trochanter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_trochanter (rear, high on femur, just below but­tocks); graz­ing wound across 2 but­tocks. Feet OK (spent time in hos­pital with trench foot)

    To Aus­tralia 3÷1÷1919
    Dis­charged 23÷3÷1919, lis­ted with no last­ing disability

    Died, Port Lin­coln in 1988 in his nineties.

    Bill Roberts is my paternal Grandmother’s father. That is, my Great-Grandfather. If he had not returned, I would not be here. When he was 80 years old, I along with my par­ents vis­ited him in his large bun­ga­low on a hill, sur­roun­ded by a large garden, in Port Lin­coln . I recall see­ing a pic­ture of him in uni­form on the wall. I remem­ber the sounds of the clocks, the age of the kit­chen and his calmness.
    Until I researched the above from the Archives, and the unit his­tory: I had no idea what he exper­i­enced. 1916 hellish winter; Third Ypres and First Amien.

    I will end the show with quo­ta­tion from Charles E. W. Bean, from ‘Let­ters from France ’ (from Pozieres)

    Stead­fast until death — just the men that Aus­trali­ans at home know them to be. Into the place with a joke; a dry, cyn­ical Aus­tralian joke as often as not, hold­ing fast through any­thing that man can ima­gine. They’re not her­oes. They do not intend to be thought or spoken of as her­oes. They’re just ordin­ary Aus­trali­ans, doing their par­tic­u­lar work as their coun­try would wish them to do it. And pray God, Aus­trali­ans in days to come will be worthy of them.

    Written by Nick Hodge

    April 23rd, 2009 at 10:42 pm

    Posted in atnickhodge,history

    atNickHodge 23rd April, “The Lost Uncles”

    without comments

    All Hail the New Show Name: atNickHodge.

    Com­ments in the chat stream from Thursday 18th’s #under­stil 7 (Conked Out and Stoked) ended with a sug­ges­tion from @LafinBoy to change the name of the show. Not because Stilgher­rian Live! nor being his under­study is a bad thing: just it is just time to gradu­ate. Up the ante. Grow up, maybe.

    After 4.2 minutes of think­ing, the only name that fell into my head is “atNick­Hodge” (@nickhodge). That will do for the moment. At least it is con­sist­ent with my strict per­sonal brand­ing guidelines. And I will prob­ably change my mind and call it some­thing else one day.

    Thanks to all my pre­vi­ous guests, and the future super sekrit guests. And a big thanks to @dekrazee1 for her help and sup­port. Oh, and @mrsnickhodge and @yin_0x7f for their guid­ance. Doing a weekly show seems to add struc­ture into my life; and is becom­ing a new hobby.

    Onto way more import­ant topics.

    Nick on Gold Beach, Normandy, France
    Nick at Arro­manches (D-Day Gold Beach) May 2004.

    The next show is sched­uled for 8.30pm, Thursday 23rd April 2009.

    URL: http://tinyurl.com/atnickhodge

    Topic this week: “The Lost Uncles”. It is Anzac Day this Sat­urday. In Remem­brance, I am going to reveal the his­tor­ies of four indi­vidual sol­diers from World War 1 and 2; each of which I have a per­sonal con­nec­tion. This show is not to glor­ify war; nor cre­ate false her­oes. It is an epis­ode just to remem­ber four men.

    Three from WW1, one from WW2; Two I am related to, two have other con­nec­tions; Two sur­vived the war, Two did not. Three were enlis­ted men, one an officer. One was mar­ried and had a child prior to enlist­ment; two had no chil­dren and I am dir­ectly des­cen­ded from one. One I met in per­son; all are in my being and thoughts.

    This show is for Lock, Roberts, Mason and Hodge.

    Lest We Forget.

    Please pop this into your diar­ies. See you on Thursday night.

    Written by Nick Hodge

    April 20th, 2009 at 1:20 pm